On Jul 22, 2014, at 3:13 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > ISPs are also making record profits, so it's not like they are hurting for > money.
Sure, it's easy to attack the people who are profitable. Nasty, evil, profitable corporations, they takes our money, precious, yesssssssss. > So what evidence is there that the costs are not covered? > > And if they aren't covered, why are they not covered for going to Netflix, > but are covered if they go to another site and use the same bandwidth? Can you, say, name some other examples of companies who peer with Verizon and send as much traffic their way? Because what's congested is the peering point, the actual interconnect between Verizon and Netflix. So, what other content providers are streaming the same quantity of traffic to VZN as Netflix is, and doing so without issue? D
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
