umm that's interesting because that soft supports exactly the type of vote we do
http://manual.limesurvey.org/Question_type_-_Multiple_numerical_input -- Jorge Sanz @xurxosanz http://jorgesanz.net Sent from my phone, Sorry for my brevity, top posting, etc. El 17/05/2014 02:33, "Alex Mandel" <tech_...@wildintellect.com> escribió: > On 05/16/2014 03:41 PM, Jorge Sanz wrote: > > 2014-05-16 17:14 GMT+02:00 Jeff McKenna <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>: > > > >> On 2014-05-16, 12:06 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote: > >>> > >>> - maybe this is the most interesting, the Open Source Initiative used > >>> "evote" (https://github.com/mdipierro/evote), will paste the full > email > >>> from OSI: > >>> > >>> **** > >>> At the Open Source Initiative, we just used E-Vote to conduct a member > >>> election, and I was pretty happy with the process (I was the admin): > >>> > >>> https://elections.opensource.org/ > >>> > >>> We contracted with E-Vote's author, Massimo DiPierro, to set it up for > >>> us, which he did a fine job of. I expect we'll continue to use it. > >>> > >>> It does use people's email addresses to send them their ballots, but > the > >>> ballots themselves are anonymous. (Technically, the election admin > >>> could use database access to figure out who did what, I suppose, but > >>> that's the only point of trust; the election itself can be verified by > >>> others without anyone's identities or votes being revealed.) > >>> **** > >>> > >> More on the evote project (I wonder if we should contact Massimo), the > >> 'features' listed on the OSI site: > >> > >> - The system is open source and anybody can check the source code. The > >> code is small and written in the Python language. This makes it easy for > >> professionals in the field to check it. > >> > >> - The system can run as a service and one installation can run mutiple > >> elections. Anybody can login into the system, create a new election, > >> register voters and managers, and customize the ballot using an easy to > >> use WYSIWYG interface. > >> > >> - The system communicates with voters and managers by email. > >> > >> - Voters do not need to login into the system to vote. They only need to > >> click on the link in the notification email, fill a web form and submit. > >> > >> - Each voter can only vote once per election. > >> > >> - Results are computed automatically at closing of the election and > >> published. > >> > >> - Voting is completely anonymous. Even a hacker with a complete database > >> dump of the system would not be able to link voters to ballots. > >> > >> - Each voter can check at any time that his vote has been properly > >> recorded and not alatered. > >> > >> - Each voter can independenty and at any time perform an election > recount. > >> > >> - Upon voting, each voter receives an email recipt containing a copy of > >> their filled and anonymized ballot. > >> > >> - Managers are notified by email when a new vote is cast and receive a > >> copy of the anonimized ballot. > >> > >> - All ballots, anonymized and digitally signed, are published, along > >> with instruciton to verify the digital signature. > >> > >> > >> > >> -jeff > >> > >> > > > > Hi Jeff, all > > > > After spending some time and several trials with opensource.org system I > > haven't been able to perform a successful vote test. We need to create as > > many questions as votes and even it seems to work, afterwards it doesn't > > collect the votes correctly. It's a pity because I like the system, > > apparently is meant for asking just one question of the three types > offered > > (ranking, select or multiselect). With more time I would try to solve the > > issue I came across. It was funny to see Karl Fogel has opened several > > tickets on this project (he's the author of the "Producing Open Source > > Software" classic book). > > > > On the other hand, and that's important, I think we need to know who is > > voting to identify which charter members are not active on their only > > required activity for the foundation so far. That system focuses > seriously > > on anonymity and for this matter at least the CRO needs to know who is > > voting and who is not. > > > > > > On the other hand I've done some tests with opina and I think it fits all > > our requirements. > > > > 1) Import a CSV of contacts into the system > http://i.imgur.com/WWh24mI.png > > 2) Customize the invitation mail http://i.imgur.com/o2OPHfu.png > > 3) Select a private survey sending a different password to any member > > http://i.imgur.com/hM5EG6D.png > > 4) Receive an email http://i.imgur.com/K2OdjQF.png > > 5) Access the survey (you have the choice to save and continue later) > > http://i.imgur.com/nIcgmKs.png > > 6) Track who voted, see results and export to CSV and SPSS formats > > http://i.imgur.com/BlHOvZe.png > > > > All that can be used as a service for free, there is no pricing model, > and > > if we are going to use it a lot we can think afterwards on installing it > at > > our server (I'm wondering if we can use this type of survey soft to ask > > ideas and feedback to our members, but that's another story). > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > If we really want to do it ourselves, LimeSurvey is quite robust. > http://www.limesurvey.org/en/ > > Not hard to install mysql/php etc... > > Thanks, > Alex > > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss