Hi Cameron,
I agree that we are discussing details, so no objection to the wording.
On 07/05/2014 12:26 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Hi Angelos,
I think your suggestion and mine are very close and we are now
"splitting hairs" about details. We could use an absolute minimum
number of votes, maybe 10 as you suggest, but I prefer "5% of charter
members who voted" which I think is more robust long term.
Unless you (and others) have a very strong objection to the wording,
I'd like to stick with the "5%" wording.
I'm going to resubmit the updated proposal to the board to vote on so
we can move onto elections. I appreciate all the feedback as I think
it has made the proposed process much better.
On 2/07/2014 8:12 am, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
Hi Cameron,
On 07/01/2014 11:02 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
On 1/07/2014 10:32 pm, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
On 07/01/2014 01:40 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
---
Some specific answers below:
On 30/06/2014 9:33 am, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
Perhaps we should ask for a minimum of Yes votes on each
candidate before acceptance. A fixed percentage of the Charter
Members maybe?
Good suggestion. Added "..as well as 5% of charter members who
voted".
So if there are 180 charter members, and say 100 vote, that would
mean you would need 5 YES votes.
In my opinion this threshold should be applied on the overall
number of charter members, i.e. 5% of 180.
Someone should have an absolute minimum of Yes votes (e.g. 10) in
order to be elected, not a relative one.
Hi Angelos,
Your comments are valid. My reason for setting the number of votes
low is:
1. I think it more important to err on being more inclusive than less.
Agreed.
2. Over the next few years, with the relaxed selection criteria, I'd
expect OSGeo Charter Membership to increase substantially over the
next few years, so 5% this year would require 5 votes, next year
probably 10 or 15, following year, probably 20 to 30.
Then lets forget the percentage and set an absolute number, like how
many members second the nomination (e.g. 5-10)
3. If active membership does drop off, having a % of votes rather
than absolute number would make it easier for charter membership to
revitalize itself later.
Angelos
--
Angelos Tzotsos
Remote Sensing Laboratory
National Technical University of Athens
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss