Hi Maxi, All,
You raise an excellent question and the answer varies depending on what
one is looking for. This whole discussion should help understand why
both organizations are complementary and not really competing that much.
Jody and Rob already pointed out some similarities and differences
related to software projects and incubation so I won't touch on that.
In my case, the motivation to get involved with LocationTech is for the
business aspect: I am a citizen of both the software developer community
(with MapServer, GDAL, etc.) and the business community (with Mapgears),
and while OSGeo does a great job for the software community, it is
lacking on the business side and I see hope in what LocationTech is
trying to build.
Why two orgs you'll ask? Can't OSGeo do it all? Can't LocationTech do it
all? I don't think a single organization can address all the needs of
all people. So diversity is good and allows different orgs to have
different and complementary priorities and strengths, and if those orgs
work together on the parts that overlap that will be in the best
interest of the overall community of people, businesses, institutions,
etc who care about free/open source geo software.
So what's different in LocationTech? My opinion is that the main
differences between the two orgs start with their different structure
and history: the members in OSGeo are individuals and the members in
Eclipse/LocationTech are businesses. This leads to setting the
priorities differently and using different approaches to reach the same
goal of supporting open source software. Essentially the result is that
today OSGeo is more community oriented, and LocationTech is more
business-oriented.
Before someone says that I'm over-generalizing, I know that OSGeo has
many businesses revolving around it (including Mapgears, and we're not
going anyway), and LocationTech has project committers reps on its
board, so both are not purely black or white. But the core of each org
is very different, we need to recognize that and work on those strenghts.
BTW, on a side note, 8 years ago I would have said that OSGeo is
software-project-driven, but I seem to have noticed a shift over the
years towards education and community. Not that this is a problem or
that projects are less important than they used to be, but just that the
membership has grown with more community and academic people than
software people, and that resulted in a small shift of priorities. Maybe
it's also that software projects have a bit less needs now that their
basic needs are served, and the next challenges are on the education and
community side? I'm not saying this is a bad thing at all (quite the
contrary), just pointing out that this shift is happening and as part of
the evolution of our organizations (OSGeo, LocationTech and others)
other shifts are to be expected over the coming years.
Back to OSGeo vs LocationTech: both approaches have their pros and cons,
and no one is better than the other, they are complementary and
LocationTech aims to fill a void for businesses that OSGeo could not
address well due to its nature. Having both is a good thing, and if they
can find a way to cooperate efficiently then we all win.
Having two orgs doesn't mean that people or projects need to choose a
camp. I believe projects could incubate under both orgs to reach their
different communities as others pointed out already, but that should not
be a requirement, and it is also perfectly fine for individuals to play
on both fronts as I, Jody and a few others do. For instance in my case
as I wrote already, I am in OSGeo for the software developer network
that it provides me, and in LocationTech for the business network that
it is aiming to build.
For those who still don't see the complementarity between OSGeo and
LocationTech after reading the multiple replies in this thread, think of
the coo-petition between MapServer, GeoServer and Mapnik, or between
OpenLayers and Leaflet. That kind of diversity is good and we treat it
as friendly coo-petition (or most of us do anyway), and it leads to
faster evolution, and many users use all of the above on different days
/ different projects depending on the specific needs/features they are
looking for. Open Source doesn't force you to choose a camp, you just
use the best tool for the task you are working on at a given time. Why
could it not be the same with OSGeo vs LocationTech as coo-peting orgs
addressing different needs?
Daniel
P.S. FWIW, I am not going away from OSGeo, I plan to continue to be
involved in both OSGeo and LocationTech since they both serve different
needs for me.
On 14-09-14 6:44 PM, Massimiliano Cannata wrote:
As you said the final goal is the same: open source Geospatial software
affirmation. And this is the best thing I can wish to all of us.
Nevertheless what I just have not clear is: what location teach do
differently with respect to osgeo? does it somehow overlap with
incubation or not? What are the distinctive features?
Personally I wonder why some of the most eminent person of osgeo (like
you) decided to work into location teach? Don't misunderstood me, I'm
not judging nor criticizing, I'd just like to understand opportunities
or aspect or services not found in osgeo and that experts and leaders
found there.
Sorry in advance for my eventual ignorance, but I think this would help
people better understand the discussion and the future of osgeo.
Maxi
Il 14-set-2014 17:05 "Daniel Morissette" <dmorisse...@mapgears.com
<mailto:dmorisse...@mapgears.com>> ha scritto:
FWIW I'm happy to hear that there was such a face to face
discussion. I believe that open communication on the issues will be
the best way to address the fears and find ways to move forward in
the best interest of the overall worldwide community of people,
businesses, institutions, etc who have a common interest in seeing
free and open source geospatial software strive.
Keep in mind that we all come to this model of software development
for different reasons (business, academic, philosophical, hobby,
etc.), but in the end we're all working towards a similar objective,
so there is no fear to be had, just different means of reaching a
common objective, and since the result of everybody's actions is
better free/open source software, everybody will benefit in the end.
Not sure if I was able to relay my thoughts properly... maybe I need
a bit more sleep.
Cheers all
Daniel
On 14-09-14 10:25 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
Guys,
as long as I understand it: "some members of the community" are
scared
of LocationTech "taking over" whatever (FOSS4G conference, OSGeo
projects and community). This can be based on real action, taken on
either site, unofficial statement, misunderstandings or personal
dislikes.
Yesterday, we had short (about 2hours) face 2 face discussion with
Andrew here in PDX (me, Vasile, Jeff and Gerald) and I personally
believe, that it is not in interest of LocationTech to "crush" OSGeo
or FOSS4G conference. It was clearly stated, that LocationTech would
like to contribute to FOSS4G and make it to better conference,
regarding (again) "some remarks" of "some members of the community"
(including myself), that the way, FOSS4G is organised, does not
necessary meet some of the community aspects, we would like to
stress.
I would like to note, that the discussion was very open on both
sides,
still calm and productive.
"To contribute" of course means "to work" and LocationTech is
anything
but volunteer driven organisation. It has been stated, that
FOSS4G-NA
next year will be organised primarily by LocationTech, but OSGeo
willl
be represented clearly and (so to say) loudly.
This could be one of the firsts steps towards closer cooperation
between LocationTech and OSGeo.
Everybody is aware, that on some points, LocationTech is not that
good, as OSGeo currently is. OSGeo is certainly failing in other
things. Looking for ways, how to strengthen common strengths and
weaken our weaknesses should have "non-zero-sum" effect.
We, as OSGeo shall later evaluate, whether the price for helping us
LocationTech with conferences (regardless if on regional or global
level), was too hight or quite ok. In case of disagreement, we shall
try to find solution for the next time.
In the worst case, we find out, that cooperation is not possible and
everybody can go it's way than.
I hope, you get my point(s) and that I did not misinterpreted
anything, what was said.
Thank you
Jachym
--
Daniel Morissette
T: +1 418-696-5056 #201
http://www.mapgears.com/
Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000
_________________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/__mailman/listinfo/discuss
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Daniel Morissette
T: +1 418-696-5056 #201
http://www.mapgears.com/
Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
