I think we could Vaclav. One of the more extreme ideas I have had is to just call it "incubation" and only assign mentors when a project has completed each of the five things we expect and wants a review / recommendation. It would free us up to take on more projects (no longer bottle necked on mentors).
My big trouble with this whole thing is the basic one: I want a project to be open source before being part of OSGeo :) So open source license and code check is the first step (not the last step). Perhaps we could allow projects to do automated/grep search for the initial code check? -- Jody Garnett On 2 March 2015 at 09:32, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in past, but >> you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs) >> > > Hi Jachym, > > do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name "OSGeo Labs" > by something else? Now we have also ISPRS-ICA-OSGeo Research and > Educational laboratories which might be often shortened to OSGeo Labs, > although I prefer OSGeoRELs for writing. The mainling list is > ica-osgeo-labs. Put perhaps it is not such an issue since the term "Geo for > All" (http://www.geoforall.org/) is now used more and more (well, the > linked website as OSGeo Labs in the title element). > > Thanks for taking this into consideration, > Vaclav > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss