Thanks Jeff. Though we had lots of discussions afterwards and continuing on this , we couldnt find any solution till now. So this might be a good opportunity to modify the Incubation's "labs" term, to something like "Community Projects" to avoid confusion if that is acceptable to Vaclav, Jachym and others. Many thanks.
Suchith ________________________________________ From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna [jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:26 PM To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure (we are approaching 2 full years that this "labs" naming has been an issue and discussed[1]) Today, knowing how ingrained the term 'lab' is in the GeoForAll education network, maybe Jachym is correct that it is a good time to modify the Incubation's "labs" term, to something like "Community Projects". [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2013-June/000134.html -jeff On 2015-03-03 3:42 AM, Suchith Anand wrote: > Vaclav, > > Please accept my sincere apologies as it was my mistake that i did not think > on this when we started the ICA-OSGeo Labs initiative (so many things were > going on at that time!). > > In universities, we generally use the "Labs" term to refer to > infrastructure/people/facilities for a particular subject. For example Botany > Lab, Robotics Lab etc. And we wanted to make sure there is a dedicated Open > Source Geospatial Lab in universities worldwide (which includes bringing > together people from various disciplines, infrastructure (the physical space) > and facilities to make this happen. Also it is easier to make use of the same > terminology/structure of "Labs" which is widely used in the university > environment to get academics start the initiative in their respective > universities (also it is easier for them to convince their higher management > on a structure that is known to them than reinvent a new term for this) . > > So it will very helpful for us if you can make use of new "OSGeo-projects" > and metioned star (or similar) rating system for the incubation as then there > is no confusion in the future. Many thanks for your consideration. > > Best wishes, > > Suchith > > ________________________________________ > From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On > Behalf Of Jachym Cepicky [jachym.cepi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM > To: Vaclav Petras > Cc: OSGeo Discussions; incuba...@lists.osgeo.org > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure > > Vašku, > > just side note: yes, whith the new "Labs" initiative "OSGeo-Labs" have to > change their name. > > My idea would rather be to get rid of current OSGeo- "labs" and "projects" > and start with new "OSGeo-projects" and metioned star (or similar) rating > system. > > Than for current OSGeo-Labs "OSGeo-project level 1" would make it (or similar) > > Jachym > > po 2. 3. 2015 v 18:33 odesílatel Vaclav Petras > <wenzesl...@gmail.com<mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com>> napsal: > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky > <jachym.cepi...@gmail.com<mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in past, but you > can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs) > > Hi Jachym, > > do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name "OSGeo Labs" by > something else? Now we have also ISPRS-ICA-OSGeo Research and Educational > laboratories which might be often shortened to OSGeo Labs, although I prefer > OSGeoRELs for writing. The mainling list is ica-osgeo-labs. Put perhaps it is > not such an issue since the term "Geo for All" (http://www.geoforall.org/) is > now used more and more (well, the linked website as OSGeo Labs in the title > element). > > Thanks for taking this into consideration, > Vaclav > > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
