For the beta website we all have the same permissions, when this goes live I hope we can cut this down :)
Many of the standards did not make sense to me, but made sense to the geoserver-dev team (for example I had forgotten about web context service as implemented by deegree). We should also have non OGC standards, like GeoTIFF and GeoJSON. -- Jody Garnett On 22 August 2017 at 10:07, Jeff McKenna <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote: > Many of these don't make any sense to me, if you ask me my opinion. We > should be using the list of OGC standards and entering them into wordpress, > and not allowing editors to edit/add new non-standards. But that is all my > own opinion :) Then we can link to these standards. As of now anyone can > create a 'standard' and post it on the beta site, seems very odd to me. > > Is my opinion here too strong? For now I chose just to edit the > descriptions for all of these 'standards', valid or not. > > What do you prefer? > > -jeff > > > > On 2017-08-22 1:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > >> Thanks jeff, I just noticed that work had been done in the GeoServer >> meeting :) We also spotted one standard "OGC" which does not make sense. >> >> Do you think it is worthwhile linking to these standards? >> >> >> >> -- >> Jody Garnett >> >> On 22 August 2017 at 09:42, Jeff McKenna <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com >> <mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>> wrote: >> >> Since we have so many website 'editors' (currently 84), please if >> you do create a new "standard" (double-quote use is on purpose, as >> many of these are not actual standards) when you are editing your >> project page, please let me know and I will edit the new standard >> and add a description - I have just went through all of these >> "standards" and set descriptions for each of the 27 "standards". >> For example: >> >> (WPS) >> >> will now appear on the project pages as: >> >> Web Processing Service (WPS) >> >> This consistency makes it much easier to read for new users to our >> site. >> >> thanks all! >> >> -jeff >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss