Note that the issue here is not nested or not; the issue is that we must
be careful with the use of the word "standard" on our new site. -jeff
On 2017-08-22 3:11 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
Never mind, you can have nesting, so OGC can contain WFS, WMS, WCS, etc...
--
Jody Garnett
On 22 August 2017 at 11:09, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com
<mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
You can click on the number, in this case 11, and see a list of the
projects implementing the OGC standard. I am deleting it now...
--
Jody Garnett
On 22 August 2017 at 10:17, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com
<mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com>> wrote:
__
On mardi 22 août 2017 14:07:04 CEST Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Many of these don't make any sense to me, if you ask me my opinion.
We
> should be using the list of OGC standards and entering them into
> wordpress, and not allowing editors to edit/add new non-standards.
But
> that is all my own opinion :) Then we can link to these standards.
As
> of now anyone can create a 'standard' and post it on the beta site,
> seems very odd to me.
Just a remainder that OGC is not the only source of standards.
For example, GeoJSON is IETF RFC 7946 for example (and before
last year, was a community standard). GeoTIFF can also be
considered as a defacto standard, etc.. You have also the ISO
standards for metadata, etc...
Probably a loose definition for standards could be a
specification available somewhere (potentially behind a paywall
like ISO...), and implemented by at least several software/vendors.
Even
>
> Is my opinion here too strong? For now I chose just to edit the
> descriptions for all of these 'standards', valid or not.
>
> What do you prefer?
>
> -jeff
>
> On 2017-08-22 1:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> > Thanks jeff, I just noticed that work had been done in the
GeoServer
> > meeting :) We also spotted one standard "OGC" which does
not make sense.
> >
> > Do you think it is worthwhile linking to these standards?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jody Garnett
> >
> > On 22 August 2017 at 09:42, Jeff McKenna
<jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com
<mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>
> >
> > <mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com
<mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>>> wrote:
> > Since we have so many website 'editors' (currently 84),
please if
> > you do create a new "standard" (double-quote use is on
purpose, as
> > many of these are not actual standards) when you are
editing your
> > project page, please let me know and I will edit the new
standard
> > and add a description - I have just went through all of these
> > "standards" and set descriptions for each of the 27
"standards".
> >
> > For example:
> > (WPS)
> >
> > will now appear on the project pages as:
> >
> > Web Processing Service (WPS)
> >
> > This consistency makes it much easier to read for new users
to our
> > site.
> >
> > thanks all!
> >
> > -jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
<https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
<https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
