Do you mean the difference between clients and servers? I would hope WMS support in OpenLayers is clearly distinct from WMS support in MapServer.
Can you clarify bobb, standards are confusing / intimidating enough as it is (especially for projects that implement a wall of them). Ideally I would like to see projects that are certified by OGC place the correct logos on these pages. -- Jody Garnett On 23 August 2017 at 08:47, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) < bob.basq...@ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote: > All, > > “Support for” and “able to use” should be separate criteria in the OGC > capabilities (I think) as well. > > bobb > > > On Aug 22, 2017, at 1:41 PM, Jeff McKenna <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com> > wrote: > > In our case, nesting won't help (if project XXX selects "OGC" as its > standards support in the wordpress backend, the reader of our site will > assume that all OGC standards are met by project XXX - so yes I agree that > the best thing is to delete the single "OGC" option. > > As for other "standards", we will need to specify that somehow. > > Possibly we can specify this directly in the description? For example: > > Web Processing Service (WPS) > > would become: > > OGC: Web Processing Service (WPS) > > > and > > Georeferenced Tagged Image File Format (GeoTIFF) > > would become: > > Other: Web Processing Service (WPS) > > > thoughts? > > -jeff > > > > > > On 2017-08-22 3:22 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote: > > Note that the issue here is not nested or not; the issue is that we must > be careful with the use of the word "standard" on our new site. -jeff > On 2017-08-22 3:11 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > > Never mind, you can have nesting, so OGC can contain WFS, WMS, WCS, etc... > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 22 August 2017 at 11:09, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com < > mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com <jody.garn...@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > You can click on the number, in this case 11, and see a list of the > projects implementing the OGC standard. I am deleting it now... > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 22 August 2017 at 10:17, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com > <mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com <even.roua...@spatialys.com>>> > wrote: > > __ > > On mardi 22 août 2017 14:07:04 CEST Jeff McKenna wrote: > > > Many of these don't make any sense to me, if you ask me my > opinion. We > > > should be using the list of OGC standards and entering them into > > > wordpress, and not allowing editors to edit/add new > non-standards. But > > > that is all my own opinion :) Then we can link to these > standards. As > > > of now anyone can create a 'standard' and post it on the beta > site, > > > seems very odd to me. > > Just a remainder that OGC is not the only source of standards. > For example, GeoJSON is IETF RFC 7946 for example (and before > last year, was a community standard). GeoTIFF can also be > considered as a defacto standard, etc.. You have also the ISO > standards for metadata, etc... > > Probably a loose definition for standards could be a > specification available somewhere (potentially behind a paywall > like ISO...), and implemented by at least several software/vendors. > > Even > > > > > > Is my opinion here too strong? For now I chose just to edit the > > > descriptions for all of these 'standards', valid or not. > > > > > > What do you prefer? > > > > > > -jeff > > > > > > On 2017-08-22 1:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > > > > Thanks jeff, I just noticed that work had been done in the > GeoServer > > > > meeting :) We also spotted one standard "OGC" which does > not make sense. > > > > > > > > Do you think it is worthwhile linking to these standards? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jody Garnett > > > > > > > > On 22 August 2017 at 09:42, Jeff McKenna > <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com > <mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com > <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>> > > > > > > > > <mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com > <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com> > <mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com > <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>>>> wrote: > > > > Since we have so many website 'editors' (currently 84), > please if > > > > you do create a new "standard" (double-quote use is on > purpose, as > > > > many of these are not actual standards) when you are > editing your > > > > project page, please let me know and I will edit the new > standard > > > > and add a description - I have just went through all of these > > > > "standards" and set descriptions for each of the 27 > "standards". > > > > > > > > For example: > > > > (WPS) > > > > > > > > will now appear on the project pages as: > > > > > > > > Web Processing Service (WPS) > > > > > > > > This consistency makes it much easier to read for new users > to our > > > > site. > > > > > > > > thanks all! > > > > > > > > -jeff > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Discuss mailing list > > > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > <Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>> > > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> > > -- > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > > http://www.spatialys.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > <Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > "The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those > who don't have it." - George Bernard Shaw > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss