Dear OSGeo community
 
I want to bring you a discussion on a github ticket about linking to "similar 
proprietary products" [1] to your attention.
 
My comment there:
 
"I support and concur with Venka that the item "Similar Proprietary Products" 
should be removed. There isn't only one proprietary GIS software out there, 
there are several others. IMHO such comparisons may be part of e.g. a reviewed 
scientific paper/elaboration, where our OSGeo projects - if they want to - may 
link to. I see no added value for OSGeo to serve such links. As already 
elsewhere mentioned by me, reciprocity is the key if such items are listed, but 
I can't see this happen. "
 
I'm pretty much convinced that more effort to help our OSGeo projects improving 
on every level (e.g. documentation, reach out, testing, etc) is the key rather 
than linking to proprietary software. One of such opportunities may be the 
upcoming Google Code In (GCI) 2017 e.g. to produce nice screenshots for 
documentation, produce some fancy videos etc. based on tiny little tasks for 
students aged 13 to 17. A good invest in the young who will be our OSGeo's 
future.
 
Kind regards
Helmut
OSGeo charter member
 
[1] https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues/100
[2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2017-September/036217.html
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to