As a regular user of proprietary GIS software (ArcGIS, FME, Oracle
Spatial etcetera) I can assure that it is very valuable to have some
sort of guidance in the diversity of the FOSS landscape.
I agree that "similar proprietary products" isn't the right label.
However, instead of the proposed "migratte from" (which sound like a
complete migration plan) I'd suggest the label "comparable proprietary
software".
Kind regards,
Gert-Jan
María Arias de Reyna schreef op 21-09-2017 8:30:
On 20 September 2017 at 02:41, Helmut Kudrnovsky <hel...@web.de>
wrote:
Dear OSGeo community
I want to bring you a discussion on a github ticket about linking to
"similar proprietary products" [1] to your attention.
My comment there:
"I support and concur with Venka that the item "Similar Proprietary
Products" should be removed. There isn't only one proprietary GIS
software
out there, there are several others. IMHO such comparisons may be
part of
e.g. a reviewed scientific paper/elaboration, where our OSGeo
projects - if
they want to - may link to. I see no added value for OSGeo to serve
such
links. As already elsewhere mentioned by me, reciprocity is the key
if such
items are listed, but I can't see this happen. "
I'm pretty much convinced that more effort to help our OSGeo
projects
improving on every level (e.g. documentation, reach out, testing,
etc) is
the key rather than linking to proprietary software. One of such
opportunities may be the upcoming Google Code In (GCI) 2017 e.g. to
produce
nice screenshots for documentation, produce some fancy videos etc.
based on
tiny little tasks for students aged 13 to 17. A good invest in the
young who
will be our OSGeo's future.
Kind regards
Helmut
OSGeo charter member
[1] https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues/100
[2]
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2017-September/036217.html
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi,
On my opinion, it makes sense to show relation between propietary and
free and open software. Just because we want to people to migrate to
free and open source software, so it is good if they can search for
the software they are currently using to know what software will they
use. It makes sense, it makes life easier on migrations.
Said this, I prefer the "Migrate from" label much better. And sure, no
link to the product, just the name. Why would we need a link? If they
don't know what that software is, the information is useless to them.
If they already know what that software is, the information is
redundant. So having a name is fine, having a link is nonsense.
Is "Migrate from" label aggresive? Not at all. We are OsGeo, we are
promoting FLOSS. Promoting FLOSS means we are encouraging people to
move from propietary to open. That is our philosophy, that is our
motto. If propietary software feels bad because we follow our goals...
well, then maybe they should stop promoting their own software too
because that makes me feel bad.
Regards,
María.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss