Are the network limits different from the network transfer numbers listed on the plans page? I always assumed that's what those represented.
(http://prgmr.com/xen/plans.html) Or am I misusing the term? You're talking in terms of Mbps, so you're approaching it in terms of speed at any given time, instead of total volume... -- Christopher B. Wright ([email protected]) "We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?" - Edward Young On Monday, June 15, 2015 02:09:05 PM Luke S. Crawford wrote: > right now, our actual limits are "don't worry about it, we'll limit you > if you get out of hand" > > but I'd like to set expectations a little better. > > Here is one proposal: to limit everyone to something (900Mbps? > 500Mbps?) something below 1g all the time, then setup some sort of > reasonable limit... if you go over that reasonable limit, I limit your > port down to something smaller, like your port becomes 100Mbps, or even > 10Mbps, (perhaps depending on the size of the VPS you buy.) > > > Should we set this limit based on total transfer? 95th percentile? > > My impression is that if we set a real (and realistic) limit we are > setting higher expectations for our network. (and right now, we're > using very little of our network, so we should set expectations higher > than they are now.) > > > I just wanted to start a conversation; if you've got other ideas, let > me know. > > Right now, I'm probably not going to buy more network, just 'cause we > aren't using what we've got now, and we're sweating pretty good to get > everyone upgraded hardware-wise. > > I'm at work on lunch now, and will be back online this evening. > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.prgmr.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.prgmr.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
