>    3) Minutes really should be approved before posting them to our archives.
>    The quick posting through discuss is being done this way so people can
>    review before approving at the meeting.

The wiki/archives can be changed, if needed. I don't know how 'official'
people want to be, I've never really held with officialness, obviously
:)

>    4) I am keeping the most recent version. That is why I am trying to add
>    the statement to contact me to add any changes. The moat recent version
>    really only needs to benin possession of the person chairing that week's
>    meeting.

That kind of thing doesn't pass the "hit by a bus" test.

>    The wiki looks terrible, is outdated, and needs serious TLC. It is on the
>    boards list of things to do, but is much less pressing than a lot of other
>    tasks we are facing.

Looks don't really matter, though we can theme it differently if that's
an actual problem.

The software isn't seriously outdated, and I spend a lot of time keeping
the information up to date. It should be reasonably up to date.

It definitely needs some serious TLC. :)

>    We have very few processes in place in the organization right now. We need
>    a bit of an overhaul and these are first steps. Yes it is rocky, and the
>    comments are appreciated! Hopefully next week all is fixed.

Yeah, processes have always been a pain point for us. We have some
documented on the wiki, but nobody follows them (or knows about them). :)

> 
>    --BP
> 
>    I agree the wiki is a probably the best place for our documents.
>    Especially if they require collaboration. However, I would like to see us
>    going back to having the agenda and meeting minutes pasted into the body
>    of emails. 
>    Brian Kulyk
>    204.887.6988
> 
>    On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>      Hey folks,
> 
>      There has been a lot of complaining on the lists lately about document
>      formats and such, so I thought I'd make a new thread for it.
> 
>      In the past week, me and Nathan updated the various wiki pages related
>      to the election. Me and Mak used to do this, but neither of us are on
>      the board now so I'd appreciate it if the current board could take over
>      responsibility for tracking our history on the wiki. It's our only real
>      historical record.
> 
>      More importantly, I've noticed Word docs going around lately. I don't
>      know where that came from, but unless we're also installing Sharepoint
>      or something similar, I think this is a bad, bad idea. Word offers no
>      way to collaborate, version, share, and link other than attaching to
>      emails and arguing about who has the most recent version.
> 
>      Plus, using commercial products is very non-hackery. I'd even call it
>      mildly embarrassing. *MY* SkullSpace using .docx? OMGZ!? :)
> 
>      Anyway, I *highly* recommend using the wiki for this sort of thing. If
>      there's some reason we stopped using the wiki, then let's tackle that (I
>      can install new plugins or whatever if that's the issue) or let's look
>      for a different solution. If we need professional looking documents, we
>      can copy stuff from the wiki into a .docx when needed.
> 
>      Much to the chagrin of others, I brought up Google Docs in the other
>      thread. Yes, it's the company I work for. I think the wiki is a much
>      better solution, but Docs has the collaboration/sharing/etc that Word
>      lacks, and is also open to all (with a Google account). We also use
>      Google Calendar, so if somebody is willing to take the time to set
>      everything up, we can use the full ecosystem. But I still think the Wiki
>      is the way to go.
> 
>      So yeah, please use this thread to discuss this sorta thing. And if you
>      *do* decide that .docx is the most hackery format, then be prepared for
>      me to complain every time I see it on the list. :P
>      Ron
>      _______________________________________________
>      SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>      Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>      Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>    Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>    Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to