Roswyne - just give it a break. What we're doing it working. We don't need
to publish a list. We decided early on that we wouldn't, and nothing has
changed.


On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:

> Great, but then other members don't know that they are making these
> assessments or on what basis.
>
> I would rather the group agree on terms, and the board act according to
> them.
> On May 8, 2014 12:54 PM, "Adam Thompson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On May 8, 2014 12:32:43 PM CDT, Ian Trump <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  OK,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I want to enter the discussion here. I feel there should be two rates.
>>> Full and Reduced (50%). Everyone by default pays Full. However, the board
>>> will listen to individual cases and grant either a 6 month or 12 month
>>> Reduced Rate for that person. I think this would be more fair and empower
>>> the board to make decisions on a case-by-case basis. A person who is a
>>> student, full or part time and/or is under employed and/or other mitigating
>>> circumstances has an opportunity to plead their individual case to the
>>> board for a Reduced Rate.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> *From:* [email protected] <
>>> [email protected]> on behalf of Roswyne <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* May 8, 2014 12:25
>>> *To:* Skull Space Discussion List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] contribute your time
>>>
>>>
>>> If we're questioning what qualifies someone as a student to determine
>>> membership fees, surely it's even more important to validate current
>>> membership status before discounting class fees.
>>>
>>> It is important that we not only treat each other fairly, but that we
>>> also do so visibly and publicly. While I am not concerned about any current
>>> member defrauding us in such a way, by definition, only non-members could
>>> do so intentionally. However, a member in poor standing (arrears) would
>>> also presumably be ineligible, and could claim a discount either
>>> accidentally or intentionally.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On May 8, 2014 10:45 AM, "Ron Bowes" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's not a bylaw, it's a policy. That's an important legal
>>>> distinction.
>>>>
>>>>  If it's a concern (which it isn't), we can rig up a place for people
>>>> to scan their keyfobs to verify membership. But that's silly. For a group
>>>> like ours, honour system is fine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Different pricing for SkSp members would almost have to be on the
>>>>> honour system, since no list of members is permitted, according to our
>>>>> bylaws.
>>>>>
>>>>> Although I suppose you could test if someone's fob is active to verify
>>>>> their membership if they indicate they are a member.
>>>>>   On May 8, 2014 10:17 AM, "Ron Bowes" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rylaan - we talked about doing that in the past (free/cheap for
>>>>>> members, not for non-members), and I'm 100% in favour. It just requires a
>>>>>> little more effort on the part of the organizer to figure out who's 
>>>>>> who(m)
>>>>>> and to collect money. Since our default stance is 'lazy', nobody's tried 
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Rylaan Gimby <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wanted to open it up all classes to the general public. Members
>>>>>>> get in free (or a drastically reduced rate depending on the class), and
>>>>>>> non-members pay. It shows off a membership benefit to non members, and 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> fee can go towards and teaching materials / teachers (if we had to 
>>>>>>> bring in
>>>>>>> a non member teacher for something specific or for certification) that 
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>> to be paid for, and the rest of the money to be donated to skullspace.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, if the group is charging attendees a fee, I would more
>>>>>>>> strongly suggest a donation be made to SkSp. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   On May 7, 2014 8:35 PM, "Ron Bowes" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Like Alex said, if a member is present, it's free. If nobody is a
>>>>>>>>> sksp member and they want to use the space, it's still free, provided 
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> fits with our goals (ie, no cross burning) but they need a member to
>>>>>>>>> babysit them. It's usually easy to find a volunteer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  The more non-members who show up, the more we encourage a group
>>>>>>>>> to donate to us, or have an option entrance fee. But we don't enforce 
>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Alex Weber <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Free, as in money? We've never mandated any cost to use
>>>>>>>>>> SkullSpace's facilities. As long as a member is present, it's free. 
>>>>>>>>>> Period.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Ric Lim <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Somewhat related to this. Is our policy for classroom use still
>>>>>>>>>>> free
>>>>>>>>>>> for a group meeting with member(s) who are part of Skullspace?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/7/14, R Rodd <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > Sounds great, Theo - I'm in!
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > "More learning?  Yes please!"
>>>>>>>>>>> >  On May 7, 2014 2:15 PM, "Theo Baschak" <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >> I have been prepping an "afternoon IPv6 workshop" since
>>>>>>>>>>> BSides basically,
>>>>>>>>>>> >> for a hackathon or perhaps even its own event. Oriented to
>>>>>>>>>>> network guys,
>>>>>>>>>>> >> server dudes, and perhaps even programmers, who want to be
>>>>>>>>>>> more aware of
>>>>>>>>>>> >> and get familiar (yes, hands on) with IPv6. Some of the
>>>>>>>>>>> topics:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> Addressing/Subnetting, new concepts (SLAAC, ULA, privacy
>>>>>>>>>>> addressing),
>>>>>>>>>>> >> v4/v6
>>>>>>>>>>> >> rough equivalencies where they exist and the differences from
>>>>>>>>>>> v4, NO NEED
>>>>>>>>>>> >> FOR NAT (but you still can), what IPv6 looks/works like for
>>>>>>>>>>> home users,
>>>>>>>>>>> >> to
>>>>>>>>>>> >> name a few.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> There has been some interest expressed by others in both
>>>>>>>>>>> putting this on,
>>>>>>>>>>> >> and also in attending such a talk/workshop.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>>>>>>> >> Theo
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> On May 7, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Robert Keizer <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> > I'd be interested in doing a design 101 course.. and I
>>>>>>>>>>> imagine that
>>>>>>>>>>> >> > with a little advertising lots of people would also attend.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >> > On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rylaan Gimby <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> That course was really exciting to me for the reason you
>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned, it
>>>>>>>>>>> >> ties
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> the fundamental hardware concepts all the way to the
>>>>>>>>>>> software. The
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> only
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> thing we need to make sure of is that the test answers
>>>>>>>>>>> don't get out
>>>>>>>>>>> >> online.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> They use this in universities, so having homework answers
>>>>>>>>>>> online is a
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> problem.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> On May 3, 2014 1:37 PM, "R Rodd" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> I could teach that course for you, Rylaan, or co-teach as
>>>>>>>>>>> I know we
>>>>>>>>>>> >> have
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> several members skilled in the material covered by it and
>>>>>>>>>>> likely more
>>>>>>>>>>> >> than a
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> few interested in teaching it.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> The video you linked mentioned it being a 12 week
>>>>>>>>>>> structure - I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> game
>>>>>>>>>>> >> for
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> doing it over the summer but when would be best for
>>>>>>>>>>> yourself and
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> potential participants?
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> From the description in the video it is exactly the kind
>>>>>>>>>>> of course
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> should have been in my Comp. Eng. program in 2nd or 3rd
>>>>>>>>>>> year to "tie
>>>>>>>>>>> >> it all
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> together" .. fortunately for me I was doing similar
>>>>>>>>>>> projects in high
>>>>>>>>>>> >> school
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> and through the IEEE student group on campus.  Those
>>>>>>>>>>> projects gave
>>>>>>>>>>> >> context
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> to the abstract theories covered in class.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> - Richard
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> On May 3, 2014 12:14 PM, "Rylaan Gimby" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> I have a Graphic Design 101 course that I've been
>>>>>>>>>>> planning for
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> years.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> Maybe it's time to put it on.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> I also just received the teaching materials for this
>>>>>>>>>>> course,
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> http://www.nand2tetris.org/ I don't know if I have the
>>>>>>>>>>> technical
>>>>>>>>>>> >> abilities
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> to put it on though, since I would be learning myself.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Adrian Stoness
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> id be down for that rhinoceros corse been yrs since i
>>>>>>>>>>> last looked
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> ath
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> that program
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> on another note justing i got a photo going up at this
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.labiennale.org/en/architecture/news/25-01.html?back=true
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Justin Lacko <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> We may not be fully sustainable on our own yet, but I
>>>>>>>>>>> think that
>>>>>>>>>>> >> with
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> each passing month we are getting closer and closer to
>>>>>>>>>>> that goal.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> In the
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> time since I've left I've seen many new names be added
>>>>>>>>>>> to the list
>>>>>>>>>>> >> of
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> members. I think there would be cause for concern if
>>>>>>>>>>> that wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>> >> happening,
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> but it is.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> As Mark said, SkSp will always be about people
>>>>>>>>>>> donating their time
>>>>>>>>>>> >> (and
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> their money) to the continuation of the space. But
>>>>>>>>>>> this is a
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> proven
>>>>>>>>>>> >> business
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> model for orgs such as ours and I think we should
>>>>>>>>>>> continue to
>>>>>>>>>>> >> embrace it.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> I think I mentioned it in the past that in my
>>>>>>>>>>> experience of
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> sitting
>>>>>>>>>>> >> on
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> a different board, that organization met at a
>>>>>>>>>>> semi-private school.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> Each time
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> we had a meeting, we made a resolution to donate $40
>>>>>>>>>>> or something
>>>>>>>>>>> >> to the
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> school, in exchange for letting us use their
>>>>>>>>>>> facilities. That
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> board
>>>>>>>>>>> >> had
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> money in the bank, so I wouldn't expect it from every
>>>>>>>>>>> org that
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> uses
>>>>>>>>>>> >> our
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> space, but I think it's the right attitude towards
>>>>>>>>>>> using our
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> space.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> A
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> gentle, non-direct request for donations in exchange
>>>>>>>>>>> for our
>>>>>>>>>>> >> facilities
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> wouldn't hurt anybody - and nobody would be obliged to
>>>>>>>>>>> donate if
>>>>>>>>>>> >> they
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> couldn't/didn't want to.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> As much as there's shared worries about the financial
>>>>>>>>>>> future of
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> space, it seems like we are on the right track, and
>>>>>>>>>>> now is the
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>> >> to
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> re-focus our sustainability strategies on growing our
>>>>>>>>>>> membership
>>>>>>>>>>> >> base
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> through value-added content, like workshops and
>>>>>>>>>>> circuit-bending
>>>>>>>>>>> >> nights and
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> everything else. In the future, it would be greatly
>>>>>>>>>>> satisfying to
>>>>>>>>>>> >> see a
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> calendar with an event/workshop almost every night -
>>>>>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> hacker-themed cooking classes to PGP how-tos to CTFs
>>>>>>>>>>> etc etc -
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> >> will be
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> the draw for people to join and donate their time.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> If I'm around in August, feel free to put me down for a
>>>>>>>>>>> >> multi-evening
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> course teaching Rhinoceros 3D modeling and VRay
>>>>>>>>>>> rendering skills!
>>>>>>>>>>> >> I'll help
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> out with SkSp however I can. And of course Friday
>>>>>>>>>>> night movie
>>>>>>>>>>> >> nights :)
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> -Justin
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> On 3 May 2014 01:33, Mark Jenkins <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> I'm very pleased to hear that a portion of the fees
>>>>>>>>>>> were paid to
>>>>>>>>>>> >> SkSp
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> a thank-you for using the space.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I see it more than just thank-you but as respectful
>>>>>>>>>>> rent decided
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> upfront -- if she's making money teaching to mostly
>>>>>>>>>>> non-members
>>>>>>>>>>> >> then
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Skullspace deserves a cut for its contribution.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> It's different if is someone is charging money for a
>>>>>>>>>>> members-only
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> workshop (then Skullspace needs no rent as Skullspace
>>>>>>>>>>> is getting
>>>>>>>>>>> >> value by a
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> member specific or member discounted service being
>>>>>>>>>>> delivered) or
>>>>>>>>>>> >> if the room
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> is used by something like a usergroup (where nobody
>>>>>>>>>>> is getting
>>>>>>>>>>> >> paid).
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> For usergroups with hacker worthy subject matter, we
>>>>>>>>>>> might not
>>>>>>>>>>> >> want to
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> go as far as asking rent, but to make a requirement
>>>>>>>>>>> that they
>>>>>>>>>>> >> circulate a
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> collection donation cup/hat/pot to their attendees
>>>>>>>>>>> each time they
>>>>>>>>>>> >> use the
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> room.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Even our internal events with non-members showing up
>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>> >> include a
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> good cup passing beg moment when we've got the crowd
>>>>>>>>>>> in our
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> palms.
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Help:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Archive:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> Help:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> Archive:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> Help:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> Archive:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> Rylaan
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> Help:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> Archive:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> Help:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> Archive:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Help:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Archive:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> >> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Help:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Archive:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> >> Help:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> >> Archive:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> Help:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>>>> Archive:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>> Help:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>>> Archive:
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>>> Archive:
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>> Archive:
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>> Rylaan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>
>>>   ------------------------------
>>>
>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>
>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>
>>>
>> This also permits the board to *not* grant the reduced rate to persons
>> who clearly don't deserve or need it but who fall under some official
>> definition of e.g. "student".
>>
>> Absolute consistency and transparency is only necessary in the presence
>> of bad judgment and irreducible bias, and otherwise constrains those in
>> authority from behaving appropriately when a situation not previously
>> envisioned occurs.
>>
>> Regulation for the sake of regulation is, IMO, a sign of pervasive moral
>> failure, and indicates an absolute lack of trust in others.
>>
>> The complement to this is that anytime you have people making decisions
>> on the basis of their own opinions, there must be an avenue of appeal.
>>
>> -Adam
>> --
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to