Fleury;329847 Wrote: > I know Moose is a fancy slipcover for SC, but my point is that the > minute or two it takes 600 album covers to load in SC takes about 15 > seconds or less in Moose. Moose does a far superior job of handling > cover art. If it is drawing on the same db cache file as SC, then > something in the web interface is the culprit, maybe Firefox (which I > am using) vs. IE?
Why are you loading 600 covers? That's always going to take time because of the way HTTP works (only a few can be requested at a time)...but the browsing modes in SC specifically limit the number of images per page for that reason. If Moose is caching the images locally then that will help it's performance a lot - but your web browser should also be doing some caching - maybe increase it's cache size? -- radish ------------------------------------------------------------------------ radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51140 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss