netim3;380976 Wrote: > The fact that the server software alternatives are free actually limits > progress here. Given the tremendous power, flexibility and UI options > of SqueezeCenter, Slimdevices could (IMHO) easily dominate the server > market simply by supporting UPnP/DLNA players (including Linn, Sonus, > Netgear etc.) Of course, that wouldn't necessarily drive increased SBR > sales. Any ideas for a commercial model that would reward Slim for > doing this?
Start with the technical idea of HOW to do this. The SC paradigm is that the server controls the player, the UPnP paradigm is that the player or a control point controls the player which pulls it's data from the server. The SC paradigm is more powerful but hard to adopt with "any UPnP" player, SC simply would not add value to these. -- pippin --- see iPeng at penguinlovesmusic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57813 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
