And another 2c:

I ran Slimserver (up to 5.4) on a dual PII-733 box, 1GB RAM for several
years - mostly OK. I now run the latest 'official' release on a P4 3Ghz box
with 1.5GB RAM under Windows 2003 Small Business Server and it mostly
performs at rocket speed - there are however significant delays (3-8
seconds) when navigating right from 'browse artists' or 'browse albums'
before the list of artists/albums is displayed. Once displayed I can
navigate through the list at high speed.

I suspect that the source of my particular problem is as follows: 
2596 albums with 48489 songs by 6223 artists

Regards
Richard
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Coates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 12 October 2005 03:01
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: Re: [slim] Re: Best Performance - recommendations?

Music Machine wrote:

>Two cents from the Peanut Gallery
>
>It seems like people are pretty happy with performance if they have
>around 350 or less albums in the database.  750 albums or more is about
>the place where no one seems satisfied with performance.  Between those
>quantities satisfaction varies quite a bit.  I could easily have missed
>posts to the contrary.
>
>On the surface it looks like data handling is the bottleneck, not
>processing power.
>
>I have no problems running SS on w2k with a 800mhz PIII and only 256
>meg ram.  My database has a little less than 350 albums.
>
>Regards,
>Music Machine
>  
>
728 albums with 8504 songs by 755 artists

My performance is still fine on 6.1.1, though there can be some slowness 
in browsing music. I guess I'd better quit buying albums :)

-- 
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture!
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin
so across the Western ocean I must wander" -- trad.

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to