alfista wrote: > > Blaming the situation on external developers it quite a stretch, and for > that matter the most commonly used software players was released by Slim > Devices/Logitech them selves, if anything I beleive the external > developers have helped hardware sales. > But I do agree the UE Radio is a sensible reaction, my impression of the > last years sales is that SB Radio has massively outsold the Touch, and > that most of those Radios only rarely if ever connect to LMS (actual > figures would be interesting if a Logitech employee happen to know). If > my impressions is correct it makes perfect sense to streamline the > products for the main customer group. I don't blame the situation on external developers but the strategy (or lack of) from Logitech. There was no protection of Logitech value, consequently no business case. As soon as derivation of players appeared on third party software products, there was an inevitable issue for Logitech. I have no issue with these developers they did what is natural, but it was bound to have consequences. I wouldn't invest in a business that has no protected intellectual property anymore. The gate are open to all.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ DaveWr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9331 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96371 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
