markiii wrote: > I think the issue is it can be designed and discussed just not with any > implication that it's a part of or in any way related to the community > squeeze project
So how did the full posting I drew from, in any way, shape, or form, reference those two taboo words? It sure got shut down mighty fast, and that's what I don't get. The hardware project, since mid-April, divorced itself from that hot-potato, and a bit later the project owner simply stated he could not devote cycles to it anymore. Then a couple of days ago he seemed to find someone who could help with a critical part of the software design to make the *hardware* work better. Then "Poof!" Gone again. Don't get it. You'd think we were discussing the building and deployment of a DIY nuclear warhead :-) So -- if it's not part of the contested project, let's move it forward! If not, let's resurrect the hard work folks working on the hardware have put into the design and rework it if necessary for one of the Pico or other squeezeslave-type players. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mbonsack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1398 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103042 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
