snarlydwarf Wrote: > So, you haven't used it, yet you feel fit to condemn the UI that you > haven't used.... > > The SB UI is actually very well laid out, and trivial to control from a > plain old remote. > > Maybe this is too direct: if the SB and Slimserver don't answer your > needs, why on earth do you keep coming back here? I mean, every day > there are MILLIONS of web sites that I don't go to because, well, they > don't match my needs. MILLIONS. > > And I never ever anticipate going to a Ford F-150 forum to explain why > a pickup truck just doesn't suit me, and why I happen to like my Nissan > better... > > Why do you feel the need to hang around the forums for a product that > you say doesn't suit your needs?
Okay, Nurse Ratched. You pose these self-aggrandizing messages questioning my intent that I have answered - to you directly in these forums even - repeatedly. I have not "condemned" anything. My criticism has been constructive the entire time. I've launched the same level of criticism at competing products even in my post above. Instead of reading my posts as negativity toward the product you zealously covet, why can't you approach this as a way to help move the product toward support to a wider audience? Apparently you are not interested in more customers or expanded capability - you really only can handle positive comments that fit your myopic and static view of Squeezebox. God forbid someone who likes the basic concept of Squeezebox but is voting for more capability than it already has. And watch out anyone who would dare to show how competitors are handling these obvious customer requests. Isn't that part of a forum discussion? -- kewe65 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kewe65's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3295 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=21466 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
