ezkcdude wrote: > Jack Coates;161492 Wrote: >> >> As for the "add it because it's cheap" argument, this is pretty cheap >> too... why not add it? >> http://www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/cubegoodies/854a/ >> > > Did I say "add it because it's cheap"? No, I didn't. I don't need a lot > of the features of the SqueezeBox, like the fancy display, nice styling, > RCA output, but they don't bother me. It seems to really annoy you that > someone would suggest adding a convenience feature that others (not you > obviously) might like. Why does that irritate you so much? When people > go on and on about upgrading the display and remote, things that I > don't care about it, it doesn't bother me. It makes me wonder why this > particular "feature" that I suggest has caused such an emotional > response from you and some of the others. The thread is about > suggestions for a SB4, not bashing other people's suggestions. > *Methinks thou doth protest too much.*
It's not an emotional response, it's a practical one. As I've said before, it *would* be possible for Slim Devices to make their products operate without an external server, just like it would be possible for Harley Davidson to make cars. R. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
