darrenyeats wrote: > Robin Bowes;214209 Wrote: >> You have got it wrong! >> > > Curse that send button! Er, thank you. > > I think I'm going to stick with unison for the time being because what > I'm after is a kind of mirror function (without using RAID) rather than > a backup tool per se. Space is (going to be) tight on both the disks. > > Perhaps I can configure rsnapshot to act like a mirror? In which case > it will be slightly better than unison - as someone pointed out, it > removes even the theoretical chance of propagating changes in the wrong > direction. So, if I configured rsnapshot to keep only one generation of > backup, would it remove / rename files for me like unison? And never > use more storage than the original files?
If you don't want the snapshots, you just need rsync, not rsnapshot. Or unison will work fine too. R. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
