-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/17/09 12:38 AM, Brad Knowles wrote: > IMO, bcfg2 is more scalable than a traditional push-based mechanism, > because the client-side pull-based method allows the clients to check in > periodically as they are able, and pull down whatever changes you want.
cfengine doesnt push either ... - -- Nick Silkey -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkpxpgMACgkQrDQjhjXrMeIbuwCgwZdJjJAkfmE+UDGHT4F4bMSV Y9sAn1bhI8NkwDpAlEULo5WWE9Lsg1Gs =sRda -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
