Article here: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/08/hp-holds-navy-network-hostage/
I'm curious to know what LOPSAers think of the Danger Room article about the Navy's relationship with HP. While I don't think it's a great idea for the military to outsource it's network operations (certainly not to the degree that the Navy has) the article's evidence is piss-poor. The costs that they quote for average workstations, security incident response, and services for spam filtering appear completely reason to me for a network the size and complexity of the Navy's (the second biggest in the world.... right behind the INTERNET!). Am I just out of it or is Danger Room stirring the pot to cause some trouble using age-old bad journalism? Gil _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
