Daniel Carrera wrote:

> Henrik Sundberg wrote:
>> Did Arend Beelen use dispatching or regular API calls?
> 
> Look, you're missing the point:
> 
> 1. Even when run headless, OOo needs X to install. Yes, even if you use
> API calls. This is an *installation* requirement.
> 2. Even when run headless, OOo needs X to run. Even if it doesn't
> actually display a GUI.
> 3. Even if the above changed, OOo alone is still a huge dependency.
> 
> OOo is an office suite. It is not intended to work as a command-line
> tool or a library. We know it is *possible* to make it work as a server
> backend. The point is that it's more trouble than it's worth.
> 
Hi Daniel,
I understand your point. But not everyboby is in your shoes. 
If using OOo headless is *possible* just now on a server without X running,
then this opens a possibility to set up a document converter server just
now. This may be a selling point for a company that wants to migrate all
legacy documents _just now_, not when the sofware will be developed (the
Best is enemy of the good). 
Let's offer the OP  all the information and let's him decide if OOo is a too
big dependency or not for his demanded work. I think he wants an intranet
solution for small business. But Apache, SQL, LaTeX etc are not small
dependencies either. 
Más vale pájaro en mano... , que cliente en otra consultoría

Enrique


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to