Laurent Godard wrote: > Hi > >> This is definitely a defect in the *process*, not in the statistics as I >> consider it to be fair to track only those patches that developers can >> spot easily. > > the defect is in teh process
I don't doubt that there is something wrong in spellchecker updating but please don't quote me out of context. The defect *I* was talking about is that our process seems to prevent the detection of some patches if the submitters can't change the issue type. And it's something I want to check with Stefan Taxhet. > There is no structure to handle SpellChecker updates and i do it when time I would be interested to hear more about that. As you wrote: > Please continue this discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's what I will do. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
