Hi Marcin, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Marcin Miłkowski wrote: > >> Hi Mathias, >> >> one more possible thing to consider: there are patches which are not >> seen as patches, as the patch submitter cannot change the status, and >> the owner of the defect doesn't see that there is a patch, see for example: >> >> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72724 >> >> This is a patch, and the chances it will be applied are quite low, as >> nobody knows who is responsible for French dictionaries now. Is this >> counted as a non-processes patch or a defect in the statistics? > > This is definitely a defect in the *process*, not in the statistics as I > consider it to be fair to track only those patches that developers can > spot easily. > > Thanks for the hint, Marcin. I will check this and see what we can do to > improve the situation. Unfortunately there is no way to discover issues with attached patches. An attachment can be anything you can think of. So we must rely on proper issue handling of the submitters here, means: they must make sure that they use the "patch" type. I changed this for the above mentioned issue BTW. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
