I definitely agree, that was a workable search setup even if it was a
bit slow and awkward. At least it found 89% of what I was looking for.
Dr. Cadwell
Robert merman wrote:
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a search box at
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html which really
queried the issue database, that is, you enter one or more terms, and
all issues containing this term in the summary (not sure if we also
included description) were displayed. Effectively the same as entering
this/those term/s in the query.cgi site, in the right place.
This caused so heavy traffic on the collab.net site (at least we've been
told that the performance problems they had at this time were caused by
the pre_submission page's database querying), that we were forced to
replace the search with the one you see today, which is absolutely
useless, in my not so humble opinion.
Perhaps we should re-introduce the better search box, in multiple places
across the whole site, and see what happens ...
Many times I have thought that OOo should dump Collab.net for another
vendor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org
