>>>>> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:52:29 -0000, "Peter McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Peter> In spite of programmers' fondness for non-alphabetical
Peter> characters, surely fooBarBaz is more readable than
Peter> foo_bar_baz?! Humans - even programmers - are more
Peter> accustomed to reading words without underscores (which are
Peter> not always easy to see anyway). Besides, fooBarBaz has two
Peter> fewer characters to type!
I wasn't passing any value judgement only reporting existing practice.
__Jason
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PPIG Discuss List ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Discuss admin: http://limitlessmail.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Announce admin: http://limitlessmail.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
PPIG Discuss archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40ppig.org/
