Ruven,

>So the argument is, since we can't change the commercial reality that application 
>domain knowledge is undervalued, those
>interesed in psychology of programming should ignore it as well and focus on what 
>color to make our variables?

There is an important difference between learning to live
with something and ignoring it.

>Further, since people are "inclined to use what they already know,
>rather than learning something new," any innovations in programming that will gain 
>acceptance
>must be restricted to those that minimize new learning?

Minimizing costs (eg, minimizing new learning) is an
important goal in all commercial endeavours.  Of course there
are situation where a benefit may be so large that a high cost
is worth paying (ie sending somebody on a three month training
course to learn new techniques).

>  So what we ought to focus on is getting people who don't understand the job they're 
> really doing to do it better, without their having to put in much effort?

Exactly.  Of course this is an ideal.  In practice there are some
people who know something about what they are doing, or who
are willing to put in lots of effort learning new things.

>In fact, I'd argue that there's a huge, rich area for investigation, training 
>programmers to learn new application domains.

And who is going to pay for this?  We both know you cannot
send turn a 3D graphics person into a database programmer by
sending them on a two week course.  Do the economics of six
month training courses really pan out?

What we need is a taxonomy of mental models for every application
domain, and a way of checking whether a person has and can use
a given mental model.  People could then match their existing mental
models against those needed to work on a given application.  People
wanting to change application domains could go on mental models
courses to learn about those they don't yet have.


derek

--
Derek M Jones                                           tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667
Knowledge Software Ltd                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applications Standards Conformance Testing   http://www.knosof.co.uk


 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PPIG Discuss List ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Discuss admin: http://limitlessmail.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Announce admin: http://limitlessmail.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
PPIG Discuss archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40ppig.org/

Reply via email to