My understanding of the working group was that they would come up with plans to suggest to the board and members as to hope to allocate funds. This doesn't require a proposal since each disbursement would be a proposal or board action.
Perhaps I misunderstood the intent though. Regards, Andrew L On Feb 27, 2014 6:31 PM, "Michael Griesacker" <mgriesac...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also: > ** Justin: Proposes that we create a working group for this grant. > ** Tim: Do they have specific restrictions? > *** They use the words "charitable use." Which carries more meaning than > may appear at the surface. > On Feb 27, 2014 6:21 PM, "Michael Griesacker" <mgriesac...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> * Devin: Let's put a 100% freeze on all new funds until we figure out a >> game plan for it. Use a financial advisor, Miami Foundation. - That's >> from the minutes >> On Feb 27, 2014 4:48 PM, "Torrie Fischer" <tdfisc...@hackerbots.net> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 27, 2014 4:38 PM, degerov...@yahoo.com wrote: >>> > >>> > There has been a misunderstanding. My proposal last night was filed >>> under discussion items, I am not sure as to why. >>> >>> I dont remember you saying anything was a proposal. What in particular >>> are you talking about, and what's the wording you are proposing? >>> >>> > >>> > D. >>> > >>> > ________________________________ >>> > From: Torrie Fischer <tdfisc...@hackerbots.net> >>> > To: degerov...@yahoo.com; SYN/HAK discussion list <discuss@synhak.org> >>> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:48 PM >>> > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Meeting minutes from 2014-02-25 >>> > >>> > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 13:50:20 degerov...@yahoo.com wrote: >>> > > Torrie, >>> > > While I appreciate your input, I don't feel your "implied authority" >>> > > argument is valid. I do not see the need to change the proposal at >>> this >>> > > time. >>> > >>> > Whoah whoah whoah, when did this become a proposal with any kind of >>> real >>> > wording? This was discussion about working on the idea. >>> > >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > >>> > > Devin Wolfe >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ________________________________ >>> > > From: Torrie Fischer <tdfisc...@hackerbots.net> >>> > > To: SYN/HAK discussion list <discuss@synhak.org> >>> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:28 AM >>> > > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Meeting minutes from 2014-02-25 >>> > > >>> > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 06:17:31 degerov...@yahoo.com wrote: >>> > > > I don't follow. If you have stated many times, champions do not >>> have >>> > > > authority. Why would anti-authoritarian-type-people have any issue >>> with >>> > > > this what so ever? They would just serve as another member on the >>> > > > committee >>> > > > concerned about the growth of SYNHAK. >>> > > >>> > > Technically, they have no authority. >>> > > >>> > > Realistically, champions have been called the leaders of SYNHAK, >>> benevolent >>> > > dictator for life, presidents, directors, and many other titles that >>> imply >>> > > some kind of authority. >>> > > >>> > > Consider also the situation of a champion taking over another >>> officer's job >>> > > while they're still on the CWG. Suddenly they are on the CWG and >>> have actual >>> > > powers. >>> > > >>> > > > Devin. >>> > > > >>> > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > Discuss mailing list >>> > > Discuss@synhak.org >>> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> > >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> Discuss@synhak.org >>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@synhak.org > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@synhak.org https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
