On Thursday, February 27, 2014 18:30:54 Michael Griesacker wrote: > Also: > ** Justin: Proposes that we create a working group for this grant. > ** Tim: Do they have specific restrictions? > *** They use the words "charitable use." Which carries more meaning than > may appear at the surface.
If thats a proposal, perhaps Justin would like to send it to discuss@ so we can discuss how it would work. You can't just bring up during a meeting "I propose FOO" and never follow up on it. What good is a proposal if the proponent doesn't work to push it through and achieve consensus? > > On Feb 27, 2014 6:21 PM, "Michael Griesacker" <mgriesac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > * Devin: Let's put a 100% freeze on all new funds until we figure out a > > game plan for it. Use a financial advisor, Miami Foundation. - That's > > from the minutes > > On Feb 27, 2014 4:48 PM, "Torrie Fischer" <tdfisc...@hackerbots.net> > > > > wrote: > >> On Feb 27, 2014 4:38 PM, degerov...@yahoo.com wrote: > >> > There has been a misunderstanding. My proposal last night was filed > >> > >> under discussion items, I am not sure as to why. > >> > >> I dont remember you saying anything was a proposal. What in particular > >> are you talking about, and what's the wording you are proposing? > >> > >> > D. > >> > > >> > ________________________________ > >> > From: Torrie Fischer <tdfisc...@hackerbots.net> > >> > To: degerov...@yahoo.com; SYN/HAK discussion list <discuss@synhak.org> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:48 PM > >> > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Meeting minutes from 2014-02-25 > >> > > >> > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 13:50:20 degerov...@yahoo.com wrote: > >> > > Torrie, > >> > > While I appreciate your input, I don't feel your "implied authority" > >> > > argument is valid. I do not see the need to change the proposal at > >> > >> this > >> > >> > > time. > >> > > >> > Whoah whoah whoah, when did this become a proposal with any kind of > >> > >> real > >> > >> > wording? This was discussion about working on the idea. > >> > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > > >> > > Devin Wolfe > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ________________________________ > >> > > > >> > > From: Torrie Fischer <tdfisc...@hackerbots.net> > >> > > > >> > > To: SYN/HAK discussion list <discuss@synhak.org> > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:28 AM > >> > > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Meeting minutes from 2014-02-25 > >> > > > >> > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 06:17:31 degerov...@yahoo.com wrote: > >> > > > I don't follow. If you have stated many times, champions do not > >> > > > have > >> > > > authority. Why would anti-authoritarian-type-people have any issue > >> > >> with > >> > >> > > > this what so ever? They would just serve as another member on the > >> > > > committee > >> > > > concerned about the growth of SYNHAK. > >> > > > >> > > Technically, they have no authority. > >> > > > >> > > Realistically, champions have been called the leaders of SYNHAK, > >> > >> benevolent > >> > >> > > dictator for life, presidents, directors, and many other titles that > >> > >> imply > >> > >> > > some kind of authority. > >> > > > >> > > Consider also the situation of a champion taking over another > >> > >> officer's job > >> > >> > > while they're still on the CWG. Suddenly they are on the CWG and have > >> > >> actual > >> > >> > > powers. > >> > > > >> > > > Devin. > >> > > > > >> > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > >> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > Discuss mailing list > >> > > Discuss@synhak.org > >> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Discuss mailing list > >> Discuss@synhak.org > >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@synhak.org https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
