Also: ** Justin: Proposes that we create a working group for this grant. ** Tim: Do they have specific restrictions? *** They use the words "charitable use." Which carries more meaning than may appear at the surface. On Feb 27, 2014 6:21 PM, "Michael Griesacker" <mgriesac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> * Devin: Let's put a 100% freeze on all new funds until we figure out a > game plan for it. Use a financial advisor, Miami Foundation. - That's > from the minutes > On Feb 27, 2014 4:48 PM, "Torrie Fischer" <tdfisc...@hackerbots.net> > wrote: > >> >> On Feb 27, 2014 4:38 PM, degerov...@yahoo.com wrote: >> > >> > There has been a misunderstanding. My proposal last night was filed >> under discussion items, I am not sure as to why. >> >> I dont remember you saying anything was a proposal. What in particular >> are you talking about, and what's the wording you are proposing? >> >> > >> > D. >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > From: Torrie Fischer <tdfisc...@hackerbots.net> >> > To: degerov...@yahoo.com; SYN/HAK discussion list <discuss@synhak.org> >> > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:48 PM >> > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Meeting minutes from 2014-02-25 >> > >> > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 13:50:20 degerov...@yahoo.com wrote: >> > > Torrie, >> > > While I appreciate your input, I don't feel your "implied authority" >> > > argument is valid. I do not see the need to change the proposal at >> this >> > > time. >> > >> > Whoah whoah whoah, when did this become a proposal with any kind of >> real >> > wording? This was discussion about working on the idea. >> > >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > Devin Wolfe >> > > >> > > >> > > ________________________________ >> > > From: Torrie Fischer <tdfisc...@hackerbots.net> >> > > To: SYN/HAK discussion list <discuss@synhak.org> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:28 AM >> > > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Meeting minutes from 2014-02-25 >> > > >> > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 06:17:31 degerov...@yahoo.com wrote: >> > > > I don't follow. If you have stated many times, champions do not have >> > > > authority. Why would anti-authoritarian-type-people have any issue >> with >> > > > this what so ever? They would just serve as another member on the >> > > > committee >> > > > concerned about the growth of SYNHAK. >> > > >> > > Technically, they have no authority. >> > > >> > > Realistically, champions have been called the leaders of SYNHAK, >> benevolent >> > > dictator for life, presidents, directors, and many other titles that >> imply >> > > some kind of authority. >> > > >> > > Consider also the situation of a champion taking over another >> officer's job >> > > while they're still on the CWG. Suddenly they are on the CWG and have >> actual >> > > powers. >> > > >> > > > Devin. >> > > > >> > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Discuss mailing list >> > > Discuss@synhak.org >> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@synhak.org >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@synhak.org https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
