On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Teddy R. Payne <teddyrpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe cfencode is the obfuscation of CF code and not the Java byte > code. A file scrambler of sorts in an algorithm that the CF application > understands.
So I wonder what would happen if you cfencoded a set of cfm templates and then cfcompiled them? I wonder if the resulting javabyte code be even more difficult to revere engineer... Most likely cfcompile's going to decode the templates before compiling them so I'd bet it's really no better. Having said that, I think I would favor cfcompile over cfencode for distributing applications since it's a longer path back to the CF code, even if you can get the bytecode back into java source fairly easily. -Cameron -- Cameron Childress Sumo Consulting Inc http://www.sumoc.com --- cell: 678.637.5072 aim: cameroncf email: camer...@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -------------------------------------------------------------
