I won't argue with any forward progress! :) +1
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Matt Raible wrote: > This is probably an e-mail best sent to the developers list (I cc'd them). > Since most developers aren't active on this project, I doubt anyone cares. > And since none of the patches seem to be "real" patches - I don't think it'll > matter. > > +1 for me. > > Matt > > > Matt, > > > > I reformatted the whole displaytag code (now it is kinda readable), and > > fixed a couple of bugs. > > Should I commit or are people holy about the code style currently present? > > > > Cheers, > > Mathias > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay > Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > displaytag-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel > -- John York Software Engineer CareerSite Corporation ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ displaytag-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel
