On 22 Jan 2004, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Pool wrote: > > >If you received distcc from Apple, then you according to the GPL they > >must either have given you the source as well, or have given you > > > > a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third > > party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically > > performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy > > of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the > > terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for > > software interchange > > > >Did you? If you got neither of these, Apple are violating the > >licence. > > You can download it here: > > http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/tarballs/other/distcc-17.tar.gz > > All of apple's open-source stuff can be downloaded from there.
Whether you can download it is somewhat beside the point. The question is whether Daniele got either the source or a written offer. -- Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc