On 12/04/2006, at 2:27 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
On 4/11/06, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Googling I've found that there have been similar
inquiries (please see below). Can this problem be
fixed by simply adding a compiler flag?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg01341.html
http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/2003q2/000997.html
I think fixing it requires a patch to gcc.
This is described here, isn't it?
http://distcc.samba.org/faq.html#gdb
(since the anchor is missing now, scroll down to "gdb can't find
source files").
If so, it's nice that there's a gcc patch, but we'd have to port it
to all
the versions of gcc we need. Easier, I think, to patch distcc,
as described in the distcc FAQ. I reposted that patch as part of the
"eight little patches" thread,
http://kegel.com/distcc/2006-03-28/01-distcc-gdb-20051210.patch
and I think it's worth including in mainline distcc. I certainly
use it.
- Dan
Does that give you byte-for-byte identical output?
--
Martin
__
distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/
To unsubscribe or change options:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
