On 17 Apr 2006, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/12/06, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://kegel.com/distcc/2006-03-28/01-distcc-gdb-20051210.patch > > > and I think it's worth including in mainline distcc. > > > > Does that give you byte-for-byte identical output? > > In what sense? > > md5sum of the .o's? It can't be that, > since otherwise the patch would be a no-op. > > md5sum of the generated opcodes? Probably; > I haven't checked. But I do compile metric boatloads of > code with this patch every day, and we haven't seen > any regression tests fail as a result. > > If you define your criterion a bit more closely, I'll try to > see if the patch satisfies it.
I meant identical .o files between local and remote compilation, which is what the original poster seemed to be asking. Obviously I don't mean between distcc before and after the patch. -- Martin __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
