On 4/12/06, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://kegel.com/distcc/2006-03-28/01-distcc-gdb-20051210.patch > > and I think it's worth including in mainline distcc. > > Does that give you byte-for-byte identical output?
In what sense? md5sum of the .o's? It can't be that, since otherwise the patch would be a no-op. md5sum of the generated opcodes? Probably; I haven't checked. But I do compile metric boatloads of code with this patch every day, and we haven't seen any regression tests fail as a result. If you define your criterion a bit more closely, I'll try to see if the patch satisfies it. - Dan __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
