On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Jamie Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to chime in: > > I still think PCH header support is essential. The problem is for projects > that rely on them to a high degree to get decent compilation speeds > already. If they disable PCH support and enable distcc, they then may not > gain anything overall until adding maybe two equally powered boxes (in my > experience). I understand that pump mode will help, but a combination of > both would be most desirable. > > So the question is: is there a simple path to migrate this patch to the new > code? Is the approach approved of? Does anyone have better ideas? Sascha: > if they do agree to it being ported, can you do so? I haven't looked at the patch in much detail yet, but I think the basic approach seems reasonable. -- Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc