Hi All I don't want to be a pain on this one, but I'm hoping we wont drop the ball on it: is there a plan to move this forward? Is anyone managing it? I know Sascha had a patch for the old version but it doesnt look like it will apply cleanly. Has an approach been agreed?
Thanks On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Jamie Kirkpatrick < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Just to chime in: >> >> I still think PCH header support is essential. The problem is for >> projects that rely on them to a high degree to get decent compilation speeds >> already. If they disable PCH support and enable distcc, they then may not >> gain anything overall until adding maybe two equally powered boxes (in my >> experience). I understand that pump mode will help, but a combination of >> both would be most desirable. >> >> So the question is: is there a simple path to migrate this patch to the >> new code? Is the approach approved of? Does anyone have better ideas? >> Sascha: if they do agree to it being ported, can you do so? > > > I haven't looked at the patch in much detail yet, but I think the basic > approach seems reasonable. > > -- > Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Jamie Kirkpatrick 07818 422311
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
