Thanks. I've added the installation details and output from a test run. Paul
On 30 January 2014 10:25, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 30 January 2014 09:12, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 29 January 2014 22:50, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> i.e. it would be nice if anyone setup to build C extensions could >> >> >> "just >> >> >> build numpy". >> >> > >> >> > This has always been possible, and if not, that's certainly >> >> > considered >> >> > as a >> >> > bug (I would be eager to fix). >> >> >> >> I don't know if you saw my comment earlier in this thread: >> >> >> >> > A quick test later: >> >> > No BLAS/ATLAS/LAPACK causes a string of warnings, And ignoring the >> >> > rest of the error stack (which I'm frankly not interested in >> >> > investing >> >> > the time to diagnose and fix) I get "RuntimeError: Broken toolchain: >> >> > cannot link a simple C program". Which is utter rubbish - I routinely >> >> > build extensions with this installation. >> >> >> >> This is a straight "pip install numpy" run in a virtualenv on Windows >> >> 7 64-bit with MSVC 2010 (full edition) installed. >> > >> > >> > which version of python ? >> > >> > For 2.x, it is expected to fail at that point, since you can't build C >> > extensions with something different than 2008 (with python.org builds). >> > >> > For 3.3, it means there is a bug that needs to be fixed. >> >> Doh. Sorry, I knew I'd forget something. 3.3. > > > Here we go: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/4245 > > David >> >> Paul > > _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
