On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote:
> I’m pretty sure all the distros have some equivalent to it, often times > with similar syntax. > e.g. look here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Versioning yes there's a parallel to our post-releases, namely "Post-Releases", but I don't see a concept for local patches of rpms. to be clear to Daniel, I'm not asking how to package a "local version" of a python package. that's straightforward (I think) because that's all contained in the "version" segment of the rpm. e.g., I recently created an rpm for virtualenv-1.11.4, because centos6 didn't have it yet: python-virtualenv-1.11.4-1.el6.noarch.rpm what's the proper way to "localize" this to not conflict later when 1.11.4 is packaged? again, sorry for the off-topic post, but I was *hoping* Nick (or someone) would have the concept handy from the OS packaging world.
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
