On Oct 4, 8:55 pm, Ivan Sagalaev <man...@softwaremaniacs.org> wrote:
> Uhm... No this is not about hand-holding or something like that. I
> propose a format that is shorter and more convenient than the
> ConfigParser's. This is the point.
>
> > My reservation with Django's own take on it is simply
> > that it goes against TOOWTDI and the Zen of Python, a little at least.
>
> Yes, this is the bad part about it. However the Zen of Python is not a
> dogma and its application is subjective. I think my proposal still
> stands and the decision is left for core devs. As for me I'll most
> probably play with the implementation of parsing of this format for our
> own projects anyway. I'll file it as a ticket if I would still like it
> by that time :-).
Fair enough, I don't really object to having a format defined in
settings.py, but I think it's a bad idea if Django uses that
configuration automagically, as I said elsewhere on this thread.
Regards,
Vinay Sajip
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
