For those who are keen to keep support for FastCGI, would you be interested in helping me develop/maintain a Pure Python FastCGI->WSGI(Django-specific) publisher package?
I agree it's valuable to have, as many have said [and I believe all have agreed] but to keep it in core is unmaintainable. And by "help", it could just be as much as feature requests, documentation, or testing [always testing! :)] -- Curtis Maloney On 19 July 2013 08:53, Javier Guerra Giraldez <jav...@guerrag.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Juan Luis Boya <ntr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > uWSGI + FastCGI: We should have nice docs about this. > > > as others have previously said, uWSGI isn't viable for everybody. is > there any other pure-python fcgi-wsgi server with reasonable > performance? > > i think several people like to use gunicorn for http-wsgi, if it (or > something similar: flask? wep.py?, werkzeug?) supports fcgi, it could > be the recommended fcgi solution. > > > -- > Javier > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
