Hi all - I updated Russ's new wiki page to include the work I've done so
far: https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/ContribEmailAuth  Again, the patch
I've been working on is here:
https://github.com/tanderegg/django/tree/ticket_20824_master  Please let me
know if you have any feedback.

The only real other option (that I can see) would be to do something more
extensive like django-authtools (
https://django-authtools.readthedocs.org/en/latest/).  I can write up a
description of this approach as well if that would be useful, although I
did write up a description of the difference between my code and the two
other existing django apps in a post earlier in this thread.

Thanks,

Tim


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Russell Keith-Magee <
russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote:

>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Luke Sneeringer <l...@sneeringer.com>wrote:
>
>> Russell,
>> I would *love* to do the work for the email-login analogue you describe.
>> I actually proposed just such a thing a few months ago but was rebuffed.
>>
>
> I'm sorry to hear this. Out of interest, did a member of the core team
> actually say "no", or was it just a matter of proposing something and not
> getting traction?
>
> If it was the latter, it's important to remember that the core team are
> all volunteers, and sometimes the spare time of the core team doesn't
> necessarily match up with the spare time of volunteers in the wider
> community. As a result, well intentioned and desired work sometimes gets
> ignored. It's not (necessarily) being ignored because it was bad -- often
> it's just "we don't have enough cycles *right now*.
>
>
>> However, I think this would be extremely useful. Also, I am, in fact,
>> looking to get involved with Django development, as I haven't quite
>> navigated the hurdles successfully.
>>
>> I do have one request, though. Is there a core developer that would be
>> willing to "mentor" my work on this, so I can make sure I am writing
>> something worthy of acceptance?
>>
>
> Well, I'm willing to mentor the effort.
>
> Like I've indicated, the first step isn't to write code at all - it's to
> get a good summary of the state of play of existing implementations.
> Multiple people have already taken a swing at an implementation; before we
> commit to one particular codebase, we need to understand what has already
> been offered by the community.
>
> Yours,
> Russ Magee %-)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Django developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/django-developers/rb7v9kVAK3I/unsubscribe
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to