Thanks for the thorough report Tim. We are glad you had a good experience 
here at Microsoft. I will send out a similar report by the end of the week 
on the SQL Server/Azure SQL Discussion on the mailing list: 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-developers/FbBcUCzrSZo. You 
bring out some great points especially about the long term partnership and 
I will update you as soon as I have more information and solid answer.

Thanks,
Meet

On Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 5:36:25 PM UTC-7, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> Report for week ending October 17, 2015:
>
> This week I spent three days at Microsoft HQ in Seattle at the first "open 
> source data camp". As I understand it, the "data camps" are normally held 
> to inform Microsoft partners about current and upcoming offerings in 
> Microsoft cloud services and to get feedback about them. This session was 
> the first time that they invited members of the open source community (3 
> for Django and 2 for Rails) as well as some startup/small business people 
> who use open-source software (5 others).
>
> Both groups were together on day one: an overview of Microsoft's cloud 
> offerings and some technical discussion with Microsoft engineers about 
> those products. This wasn't of much interest to me, but the idea seemed to 
> be that we had to sit through this because the "data camp" budget was used 
> to allow us to attend. On days two and three, the "users group" 
> participated in more talks while the Django & Rails attendees worked with 
> Microsoft engineers to give them some insight on what's needed to improve 
> MSSQL/Azure database support as well as to actually write some some code.
>
> Some of the things we accomplished:
>
> * Completed an initial Jenkins integration on Windows: Microsoft engineers 
> helped fill the gaps in my knowledge so that we could get our Jenkins CI 
> infrastructure running the tests on Windows (SQLite, Python 2.7 + Python 
> 3.5 only; however, I think this should be sufficient for now as I can’t 
> remember a time when we received a bug report for a database-specific 
> Windows issue). I’ll probably add pull request integration once things are 
> running smoothly. We still have at least one time-dependent test failure on 
> Windows (ticket #25562). Unfortunately, the setup process on the Windows 
> slave is entirely manual (unlike the setup of the Linux machines which is 
> automated with Ansible playbooks), however, it's not very difficult once 
> you know the steps which I'll document when I get a chance. An idea from 
> one of their engineers was to try Appveyor (think Travis CI for Windows) 
> and got a test integration working there as well. It's an option if the 
> Jenkins solution proves difficult to maintain, but I think there's no need 
> to add a new service to our workflow for now. 
> http://djangoci.com/job/django-windows/
>
> * Improved teardown strategy in schema tests to fix MSSQL support: Michael 
> had some work on the 1.7-era on this, but the patch was never committed and 
> didn't entirely work, so I updated it and merged it to master, 1.9, and 
> 1.8: https://github.com/django/django/pull/5433
>
> * Investigated speeding up the django-mssql test suite: It takes something 
> like 8 hours due to excessive constraint checking enabling/disabling which 
> is very slow on MSSQL. This is no longer an issue on Django 1.9+ due the 
> removal of deprecated initial data fixture loading, however, some solution 
> for 1.8 seems important. I've proposed a pull request and am awaiting 
> Michael's testing of it: https://github.com/django/django/pull/5438
>
> * Discussed the long-term roadmap for MSSQL support in Django. I'll let 
> Michael speak to the details of this.
>
> On the last day, I wondered "what's next?" and voiced my skepticism about 
> Microsoft following through with the resources to get support for Microsoft 
> databases on par with our built-in database backends. During a conversation 
> with Meet Bhagdev, the Microsoft program manager who invited us, I shared 
> my idea of Microsoft hiring someone full-time to not only maintain the 
> Microsoft database backends, but to participate in the Django community at 
> large, a sort of "Microsoft Django fellow". Meet thought this wasn't out of 
> the realm of possibility and encouraged me to bring it up at the executive 
> Q&A that day with two of the SVPs. The execs seemed open to the idea and 
> suggested it's mostly dependent on finding the right person. If you or 
> someone you know is interested in this, let me know and I'll pass your name 
> along.
>
> There were also two Ruby on Rails community members in attendance. They 
> learned about some difficulties of installing Rails on Windows and how 
> that's really a diversity issues since most new programmers will be on 
> Windows. That's something for the Django community to keep in mind, but I 
> hope programs and tutorials like Django Girls will keep us honest.
>
> Overall, I thought it was a worthwhile trip, especially if it results in a 
> long-term partnership with Microsoft.
>
> Other attendees for Django:
>
> * Michiya Takahashi (maintainer of django-pyodbc-azure)
>
> * Michael Manfre (maintainer of django-mssql)
>
> Triaged
>
> -------
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25545 - ORM generates incorrect 
> queries for m2m with disabled backward relations (duplicate/backported to 
> 1.8)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25537 - Model objects not showing 
> on admin changelist page after changing M2M to ForeignKey (worksforme)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25551 - makemigrations when adding 
> a ForeignKey to a newly created model along with a unique_together 
> constraint must create fields before the unique_together constraint 
> (accepted)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25554 - Django permissions cause 
> data migration depending on permissions to fail (duplicate)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25552 - Admin readonly field help 
> text show 'None' (wontfix)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25557 - Fix the UserCreationForm 
> for custom user model (duplicate)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21894 - Error in example code in 
> django.forms.Form.clean() (accepted)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25541 - Improve error reporting 
> when loading invalid JSON fixtures (accepted)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25547 - refresh_from_db leaves 
> FieldFile with reference to db_instance (accepted)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25553 - Add lazy version of 
> admin_static's static (wontfix)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25563 - Data migration causes 
> incorrect tests behavior when custom manager is using .defer() (accepted)
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25559 - Conditional admin inline 
> causes ValidationError (wontfix)
>
> Authored
>
> --------
>
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/5413 - Fixed #25550 -- Deprecated 
> direct assignment to the reverse side of a related set.
>
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/5433 - Used 
> SchemaEditor.delete_model() for teardown in schema tests.
>
> Reviewed/committed
>
> ------------------
>
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/5419 - Fixed #25535 -- Made 
> ForeignObject checks less strict.
>
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/5396 - Fixed #25506 -- Allowed 
> filtering over a RawSQL annotation.
>
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/5434 - Fixed #25558 -- Fixed 
> nondeterministic test failure on Windows: test_clearsessions_command.
>
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/5425 - Fixed #25346 -- Allowed 
> collectstatic to delete broken symlinks.
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/5429 - Fixed #25517 -- Made Concat 
> function idempotent on SQLite.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/ae71f1eb-bb06-4dab-bdfa-23a0b8461dff%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to