On May 9, 2014, at 8:48 PM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
>>> There's only a single author posting here now. Just thought I'd mention it. >>> It's definitely broken some functionality I rely on - some of it easily >>> fixable, some not. >> >> I thought for sure the archives would have broken, but it doesn't look like >> it: >> >> http://lists.dmarc.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/2014-May/002817.html > > Oh, wow. The mail going into the archive isn't the same as the mail > going out to the list. I wonder what we'll "fix" next. This feels like complaining for complaining's sake. Do you prefer that the from address in the archive be similarly modified, or do you prefer to limit the modification to only exactly when necessary? Regards, Al Iverson _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
