On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote: > On 5/9/2014 7:10 PM, Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss wrote: >> This feels like complaining for complaining's sake. > > You think that it's irrelevant that a mailing archive archives something > different from what mailing list members receive???
I'm trying to figure out what invisible yet inviolable rule is being broken here. What does "something different" in this case mean and how is it bad? Regards, Al Iverson _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
