On May 10, 2014, at 4:48 PM, Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote: >> On 5/9/2014 7:10 PM, Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss wrote: >>> This feels like complaining for complaining's sake. >> >> You think that it's irrelevant that a mailing archive archives something >> different from what mailing list members receive??? > > I'm trying to figure out what invisible yet inviolable rule is being > broken here. What does "something different" in this case mean and how > is it bad? Remember when mailing lists began to obfuscate email addresses in the list archives to help prevent spam bots from harvesting our email addresses? Since the archives were then "something different" from what list members receive, they were no longer "true" archives and just like this little change, very very bad, bordering on evil. Matt /me dials the tongue-in-cheek meter down from 11 _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
